Ns2 And Matlab Integration

Hello, good guys am new to linux and also the issue of NS2, I need to run by the NS2 + WiMAX + LTE, the more I'm in trouble, I did this step by step http://gotoanswer.stanford.edu/?q=in...imax+in+ns2.35, installed straight over at the time I enter / ns2-35 / tcl / wimax and run a script with the $ ns wimax-script.tcl command it returns an error as shown in the image below, if anyone can help me I would be very grateful, hugs.

@obs.:I am using windows to make the simulation more the same error is repeated in linux.

https://dl-web.dropbox.com/get/Captu...K-UC2uSPQn_xtA

What is the best simulator for OBS networks? Why?
Is it obs-ns? matlab? n-obs? pleaseeeeeee help me.

Hi, does anyone know if gang scheduling is implemented in Linux? And if so, can you recommend any books/articles/site where I can learn more about it? I am trying to implement it on FreeBSD, so if anyone has any information about that, it would be very helpful

Thank you!

Hello, I want to deploy some AD-like login and user management. All devices in network use Linux (Debian, 5-10 workstations).
The first idea is to use Samba4 because everyone is talking about how it is AD-compliant, but I think it's not needed, because there's no windows workstations, and it gives additional windows-specific tools and protocols like netbios, etc.

Next thought is, that FreeIPA is good idea, but I don't see it in Debian's repos (only sid).
I could try to install it from sid, but I'm afraid it's not stable and production ready. I see it stable only in RedHat family (centos/fedora).
What is more, freeipa-client is not even in jessie's repo. I heard about sssd as a client in Debian for FreeIPA.

The last idea is to use OpenLDAP. I'm sure it's supported by Debian very well, but I'm afraid of lack of integration with other tools like kerberos, etc. I've got ntp, dns, dhcp, some file sharing, etc. done right now without ldap, so I don't really need all that additional stuff.

Is using Centos/Fedora is only way to have FreeIPA?
Is it possible and supported to use Debian as client of FreeIPA?

Do you have any advice on the best way to do this?

I am about to attempt my first software installation - upgrading my LibreOffice package to the latest version. Since all my software came preloaded with my computer I have not been involved in this exercise previously.

I realize how irritating newbies can be, by asking questions that have already been answered in other threads, so I have read the post offering basic software installation instructions, together with anything else that seemed relevant. Then I got the installation instructions from the LibreOffice website. When I compared these with the LQ version it was difficult to find much in common, so what do I do? I am inclined to follow the LibreOffice instructions. Apart from anything else, they are simpler. However, I notice reference to a 'desktop-integration' folder in the latter. I do not appear to have such a folder in my present system. Can I assume that it will be created as part of the installation of the updated package?

I am happy to experiment but one thing that terrifies me is the instruction to purge my existing version of LibreOffice before installing the latest one. I do not question the logic of so doing, it being pointed out that otherwise I will finish up with both new and old versions. The worry is that, if I remove the old version and am then unable to successfully install the new one, I will have well and truly 'burned my boats behind me'- and I have only just got the spell checker to work in the old version!

I have so far managed to download the .tar.gz file and extract the installation folder and associated files from it. I realise that the latter could well be lost when purging the existing LibreOffice installation but that does not matter. I have slightly renamed the .tar.gz file so that the purge command will not find it. I can then quickly re-extract the installation folder, with its .deb files, if I need to, the extraction process yielding exactly the same files whatever the .tar.gz file name.

I am just about ready to jump but I would like a handle on the 'desktop-integration' file, or folder, before I do.

I'm not actually that newbie,I already experienced Kali linux, Ubuntu and Slackware, but the last one was to much hands on to me. I don't want something simple like Ubunt, but nothing that slack, like slackware. My interests are programing, using matlab, learn the basic of script and general linux programing, run windows aplications, develop for linux windows and android. I really get into something challenger, but also smart, Wich could recognize my cards and install drivers. Something advanced wich i would personalize, and something wich would make me learn, but please, no slackware! Maybe someday, but not this time.
Another thing. KDE or GNOME environment

Please, be reliable and honest as such is possible and I'll have no words to thanks. I really want to get into linux in first category. If I would to use a slogan to my life I'd say: Quote:
"Not the hard or easy way, not the curved path or the straight line, the smarter choice!
Why to go in the full way when I can get a shortcut? The answer: Will I learn with it, learn enogh to take a shortcut in the future? What is gain and when the questions will stop? Will they stop if i choose the shortcut?
If a have to make something, let's do it in the easy way, no need to reinvent anytihng.
The only thing that I don't want is to be alone. This doesn't mean to be without anyone to talk or help, however it also makes part, besides what really minds is to have someone else with information; the only thing that can go faster than light, the only thing that can make the world make sense; to share with you and to share for us. Just like univeverse couldn't make sense with only two electrons, it also could'nt make sense without people and coletive learning, for us, by us, through us... "
That was to much, but now you must now what I want.

I am implementing a new protocol in NS2.
I stucked at a point. kindly help me.
Is it possible to make two different type of packets(containing different headers) in the same simulation
In my protocol there are two types of struct header { } . At few instances i want to use one and at other instances want to use another.One of the structure has very less fields compared to other so this would reduce the size of packet i'm sending.
Is it possible ? and if yes then how to implement that?

Hiii.. i am going to integrate the zrp in ns2.35 and facing the error.... plz help me to remove this error....


trace/cmu-trace.o: In function `hdr_zrp::access(Packet const*)':
cmu-trace.cc.text._ZN7hdr_zrp6accessEPK6Packet[hdr_zrp::access(Packet const*)]+0x7): undefined reference to `hdr_zrp:ffset_'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [ns] Error 1
Ns make failed!
See http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ns-problems.html for problems

I have implemented black hole attack in AODV protocol. I simulated it through NS2 simulator and every time during building the simulator the simulator is built but after the result analysis and observing the NAM simulation I saw that the black hole is not working properly . The packets are not being dropped. So if anybody has done that please suggest me where should I correct my errors.

Dear All,
I am trying to Simulate a Body Area Network in NS2 using Mannasim. I would like to know whether BAN implementation in NS2 using Mannasim is possible or not?